Prosecutors have based their sentencing demands to the court on aggravating factors. How many times the defendants came to the Pelicot home, whether they touched Gisèle Pelicot sexually, and if they penetrated her.
Joseph C, 69, a retired sports coach and doting grandfather, faces four years in jail for sexual assault if found guilty. That is the most lenient sentence requested by prosecutors.
At the other end of the scale, is Romain V, 63, who faces 18 years in prison. He was knowingly HIV-positive and yet he is accused of raping Gisèle Pelicot on six separate occasions without wearing protection.
Prosecutors have been able to go into this level of detail because, unusually for a rape trial, there is a staggering amount of evidence, as the alleged assaults were filmed over almost a decade by Dominique Pelicot.
He has admitted all the charges against him and has told the court all 50 of his co-accused are guilty too.
All the video evidence means none of the men have been able to deny they ever went to the Pelicots’ home. But the majority vehemently contest the charges of aggravated rape that would incur hefty sentences.
France’s rape law defines rape as any sexual act committed by “violence, coercion, threat or surprise”; it has no reference to any need for consent.
Therefore, they also argue they cannot be guilty of rape because they were unaware Gisèle Pelicot was not in a position to give her consent.
“There can be no crime without the intention to commit it,” said one defence lawyer.
“My body raped her, but my brain didn’t,” insisted volunteer firefighter Christian L, in an example of the convoluted reasoning offered by some of the men.
The one man of the 50 who is not accused of raping Gisèle Pelicot is Jean-Pierre M, 63, who has been dubbed Dominique Pelicot’s “disciple”.
Having learned how to drug his wife in order to abuse her, he did so for five years and admits it.
He blames his crimes on meeting Dominique Pelicot, who he says was “reassuring, like a cousin”. Prosecutors are seeking a 17-year jail term.